中文

Stasher vs. Ziploc Endurables: What are the best reusable food storage bags?

EntertainmentPublished: 2025-04-28 05:19:58
Share
Share this with Close
MessengerPinterestLinkedIn

"Eco-friendly Ziploc bags" was an oxymoron until mid-2022, when the food storage bag brand introduced a new line of Endurablescontainers and pouches made from silicone. 

But this isn't the first time Ziploc's parent company, SC Johnson, has dabbled in the genre: It acquired Stasherin 2019, a Shark Tank-famous brand known for its colorful, slightly expensive bags and bowls.

Together, they're now two of the biggest names in reusable food storage. It only feels right to pit them against each other.

a top-down view of reusable silicone storage bags from stasher and ziploc endurablesStasher's bags are available in a rainbow of colors (including limited-edition hues), while Ziploc Endurables are only available in blue. Credit: Haley Henschel / Mashable composite

Ziploc (finally) goes truly reusable

For all intents and purposes, and as much as the brand might like you to think otherwise, the regulation Ziploc bags that have been around since the 1960s are single-use plastics.

A Sustainability and Safety pageon the Ziploc website says consumers can recycle its resealable freezer, snack, and sandwich bags, which are made from soft, nondurable low-density polyethylene(LDPE, or plastic type #4). But that claim may be misleading: Many recycling facilities won't accept LDPE because it tangles easilyin heavy machinery. A 2022 Greenpeace reportestimates that the current U.S. domestic reprocessing capacity for LDPE plastic waste clocks in at under 5 percent; the recycling facilities that do collect it usually do so as part of mixed plastic bales, which are often disposed of via landfills or incineration.

SEE ALSO: I went 10 days avoiding single-use plastic. It was impossible.

Ziploc has also gone on the record stating that its LDPE bags are "reusable" if you thoroughly hand-wash and dry them, but I think I speak for most people when I say: No one does that. How much reuse can you reallyget out of thin, filmy packaging, anyway? You're just delaying the inevitable: a centuries-long interment in a hot pile of garbage, or another ingredient in the ocean's microplastic soup.

Ziploc's recent move to reusables was especially intriguing to me given its longtime association with (and defense of) LPDE products. Could the Kleenex of disposable plastic storage bags actually swing an eco-friendly redemption arc?

Stasher vs. Ziploc Endurables: Design

different views of the Stasher Half Gallon Bag and the Ziploc Endurables Large PouchThe Stasher Half Gallon Bag (left, top) and the Ziploc Endurables Large Pouch (right, bottom) are eight-cup counterparts with some key distinctions. Credit: Haley Henschel / Mashable composite

Stasher and Endurables bags are both made out of the same durable platinum silicone, which is heat-resistant (up to 425 degrees Fahrenheit), food-safe, and free of BPA, latex, and phthalates. Their individual aesthetic differences are a little nit-picky, but noteworthy nonetheless:

You're basically comparing two different kinds of apples here, but I preferred Stasher's designs in my hands-on testing: They come in a much wider variety of shapes, sizes, and color options, and that seal snaps together cleanly and securely; it takes a few tries to get their Endurables cousins closed.

Stasher's bags being stiffer also made them much easier to keep open in a dishwasher's prongs. Neither are particularly easy to hand-wash, but scrubbing down a large Endurables pouch felt like wrestling with a floppy, slippery fish.

Winner: Stasher

Stasher vs. Ziploc Endurables: Value

You'll pay a premium for that quality: Stasher bags can be about 50 percent more expensive than Endurables, depending on the bag shape and size. Here's a price breakdown for each of their equivalent styles for comparison's sake:

Mashable Top Stories Stay connected with the hottest stories of the day and the latest entertainment news. Sign up for Mashable's Top Stories newsletter By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Both brands' bags will technically save you money in the long run, since they break the buy-dispose-rebuy cycle of relying on regular plastic bags. But in terms of upfront cost, Ziploc is the obvious affordable choice.

Winner: Ziploc Endurables

Stasher vs. Ziploc Endurables: Functionality

a top down view of silicone bags filled with asparagus in a freezer and silicone bags filled with snacks on a backpackStasher and Ziploc Endurables bags both work best when they're used for simple tasks like freezing leftovers and storing snacks. Credit: Haley Henschel / Mashable composite

It's worth noting how differently SC Johnson markets its two silicone bag brands. Stasher is the one that's explicitly billed as a sustainable, difference-making swap for single-use plastic bags — its websitefeatured the crunchy tagline "Save Kale & Whales" at the time of publication — while the Endurables are pluggedas utilitarian, all-in-one meal prep tools that can "unloc [sic] freezing to sizzling in a snap." (Inside of you are two wolves, or something.) 

At the end of the day, though, they're effectively the exact same products in terms of functionality and versatility. Both of them can be used for storing snacks, freezing leftovers, marinating, microwaving, and baking (again, up to 425 degrees), and you can toss them on either rack in the dishwasher afterward without fear of cracking, fogging, or peeling.

My Stasher and Endurables bags performed as promised — they could do everything listed above — but I wouldn't go so far as to call them kitchen miracle-workers.

There was one night where I made baked chicken breast for dinner using both brands' eight-cup bags, as per instructions on their respectivewebsites. To their credit, I was impressed with how they were able to go directly from marinating in the fridge to cooking on a sheet pan in the oven. It was a minor but welcome convenience, and one that was almost instantly nullified by the ugliest, most off-puttingly beige cutlets I've ever seen in my life and a mess of crusted-on chicken juice. (I'll be honest: There was a brief, weak moment where I considered just trashing them both.) I'm still trying to think of a logical reason why you wouldn't just put the chicken directly on the pan by itself.

two side by side images of chicken cooked in an oven inside reusable silicone bagsThese bags have no business being here. Credit: Haley Henschel / Mashable composite

To reiterate: Did the bags work as advertised? Yes. Is it a pleasant user experience? Not really, no. (This feels like an apt place to mention that Stasher offers directionson how to prep and cook a whole Thanksgiving dinner using its bags, which I would interpret as a cry for help.)

On a more positive note, I thought that both bags were especially great for freezing leftovers. Nothing's really able to stick to their rubbery insides, and they seal up airtight to prevent freezer burn. Ditto for carrying around snacks, but that doesn't feel like a huge ask.


Related Stories

Winner: Tie

Stasher vs. Ziploc Endurables: Recyclability 

Silicone products can last for years and don't break down into harmful microplastics, but they're not the end-all, be-all solution to curbing our dependence on single-use plastics — mainly because they, too, are difficult to recycleonce they're out of commission; most facilities don't accept silicone.

The great news is that Stasherand Ziplochave both partnered up with TerraCycle to sponsor free recycling programs, making this a non-issue for owners of their respective products. I wasn't able to try this portion of the "Stasher versus Endurables" experience, but it sounds incredibly easy: You just create a TerraCycle account, find a box for your unserviceable bags, and ship it off using a prepaid UPS label. More companies should do this.

Winner: Tie

The verdict

a top-down view of reusable silicone storage bags in a kitchen drawerThis is some seriously close competition. Credit: Haley Henschel / Mashable

I personally reach for Stasher bags more because of their myriad style options, better-feeling build quality, and breezier cleanup, but Endurables are still a solid budget pick for anyone who's just starting to make the move away from single-use plastic storage bags. Both brands are sold in stores at major retailers like Target, Walmart, and Kroger, so I'm tempted to just recommend buying whatever's in stock or on sale when you're out running errands.

I'll couch that with a brief word of advice, which is that you should expect an adjustment period when you first start living with reusable silicone storage bags: They don't have the same mindless ease of single-use plastic ones, since there's maintenance involved. But I think we could all be better at learning how to sacrifice some convenience for the sake of our collective wellbeing.

Winner: Stasher (barely)


How I tested

I spent a week using Stasher and Ziploc Endurables bags as my primary food storage containers, and tried to work them into cooking whenever possible to see if they lived up to their multifunctional claims. This included:

I should note that my Ziploc Endurables sampler pack only included two Large Pouches, so while I had several different-sized Stasher bags and bowls on hand, I really only used its Half Gallon Bag for the sake of fair comparisons in testing.

Share this story on

MessengerPinterestLinkedIn


                                                         FLINK:     

                                                         LINK: